It is likely that when engagement rings come to mind, you picture a man kneeling on one knee, a lady with an extended hand, followed by screams, jumping for joy, along with hugs and kisses.
What follows next is a post on social media, where the woman has her hand stretched out, showing off her new ring and beaming with joy. The caption is the typical “I said yes” or something similar.
The proposal is a joyous moment for many women (unless they say no, then that’s embarrassing, yikes!), indicating that getting an engagement ring holds true meaning. It varies from woman to woman, but if you’re wondering what the fuss about these rings is, I am here to help.
There’s a long-standing tradition of engagement rings in the past, but in those times, the meaning wasn’t what we’ve come to know it is today. In those olden times, the ring meant that you were indeed wed, exchanging dowry or other pre-agreed on items. Engagement rings nowadays are about making a promise to another that you’ll marry them. Essentially, all roads lead down the aisle, whether it takes months or years for that to happen.
The engagement ring holds different means for the women who get them, however. Let’s look at some of those and help with examples why they matter in the first place.
It’s an official wedding announcement
As mentioned, an engagement ring typically indicates that the next step of the relationship is marriage.
With the ring on her finger, the woman lets others around her know she’s off the market and ready to work toward legalizing the union with her significant other.
It is why the typical reaction after an announcement is “congratulations!” since it’s considered a massive step in a woman’s life.
Some disagree; there are more important things in life for a woman, though it is agreed that getting engaged is significant.
It shows the willingness for a man to invest in his woman
There is pressure for the man to spend a significant amount of his income and even savings to get a woman an impressive ring.
The material and the size of the rock on the ring may vary, but the ring itself needs to stand out, no matter one’s social class.
A janitor shouldn’t break his bank trying to compete with a real estate broker, but to the woman, thought and effort still needs to go into getting the perfect ring she can showoff.
Therefore, if he can dish out a significant amount for a ring, then he can invest in other areas of her life as needed.
It’s a symbol of commitment
Rings do mean that the woman is off the market, and an engagement ring does just that.
They allow the woman to make it clear to the rest of the world that there is someone she has chosen to commit to, having after all said " yes" to the ring.
In placing the ring on her finger, it signals in her mind that you’ve chosen to take the relationship to new heights and see a future together.
You might not walk down the aisle the following week, but having the ring on for however long symbolizes a promise to wed her.
It reduces anxiety
For a while now, relationships have been about forming deeper bonds and a sense of security.
If you’re in a relationship, most people look for a sign of commitment, and that’s what an engagement ring shows.
Being with a significant other for years and not show their willingness to put a sense of permanence to the relationship can cause anxiety.
While there’s the reality of divorce, people enter relationships with the hope of a lasting union.
Therefore, not having a ring can signal to a woman that you’re not interested in securing a future with them, and that can cause a rift.
It is about love, not the cost of the ring? Really?
A study from Emory University, a private research university, concluded that couples that spend above $2,000 on wedding rings are 1.3 times more likely to end their relationship in divorce. The study found that less is indeed more; those who spent between $100 to $1,000 have lower divorce rates. I guess these couples are realistic about what the ring symbolizes.
The unfortunate disillusionment rates are the cost of the ring and put a financial strain on the relationship.
While it is okay to want the best in life, consider whether the expensive ring symbolizes love or societal status. Have a conversation with your partner to avoid a rift in the relationship.
It could be superficial
Not all engagements have a fairytale feeling to them. In some instances, it is about status and watching to show the world that you have a woman in your life to check a box and not out of love.
One classic example is having a trophy wife, a beautiful woman who can show off to their peers. For the woman, the ring won’t mean much.
It will be something she’s chosen to wear as a form of agreement to be wedded to another. It could be she’s focused more on the financial benefits of the same, giving in to pressure and other reason.
In such a case, the ring doesn’t mean much, at least not in the emotional “I love you” aspect of it.
It’s part of the social pressure
Some women don’t believe in the institution of marriage; they are pretty okay with someone all their lives and never have to say “I do.”
Others still are minimalistic that even a ring is too much, or sometimes not practical for their line of work.
While that might be their stand, in some instances, they get social pressure from close friends and family to get an engagement ring; after all, that’s what everyone does.
In this case, the ring is not symbolic of their relationship but rather a way to get people off their backs. It’s not the best reason, but if it works, that’s what the ring means.
While this is not an exhaustive list, it has perhaps given you a broader picture of why proposals and engagement rings are a huge deal (or not) for women in general.
The rings are overall worth the fuss since the overarching theme of getting a ring in the first place is to signify love, commitment, and a promise of a marriage in the future.
For the one getting the ring, understanding what it potentially means for a woman makes getting the ring more meaningful, not merely getting a ring simply because society dictates that it’s something that should be done.
If we end it. Can She keep my engagement ring ?
Who gets to keep the ring if the engagement is called off?
Whether you purchased the ring or you were the one proposed to, there are a few ways the courts can decide who gets to keep it if you didn’t go through with the wedding. While some countries like the UK uniformly allow the receiver to keep the ring, individual states in the U.S vary greatly in deciding who gets to keep it.
In the U.S, individual state laws typically decide based on how the ring itself is classified. It is important to note that the following are general guidelines and each case is dependent upon which state and under what circumstances the ring was given. Here are the most common ways states can decide who gets the ring;
1. The ring as an unconditional gift
A gift in these circumstances must have 3 elements;
This type of a gift, as hinted by the word ‘unconditional’ means that once these three events have occurred, the giving of the gift has been completed and cannot be revoked. Basically, you can’t get the ring back if you’ve given it to someone as a gift.
Generally, the receiver keeps the ring.
2. The ring as an implied ‘conditional’ gift
Adopted by the majority of states, the ring in this instance is considered subject to or based upon a performance or condition. The gift has the same three elements as above, but there is a fourth element in which a condition is stated – the marriage itself. If the two parties breakup and don’t go through with the marriage, the ring will go to the ring giver. In this case, it doesn’t matter who broke off the engagement or the details of the failed relationship.
Generally, the giver keeps the ring.
3. The ring given as compensation
There are some cases in which the courts have added another component to the identification of ownership of the gift after the break up: the gift as compensation. If the receiver and the giver entered into some agreement that the ring was given in exchange for something, e.g. free labor, services to improve a business etc. then it may be seen as non-monetary compensation for services rendered.
Generally, the receiver keeps the ring.
4. Fault-based approaches (like Contract Law)
In these cases, the entire engagement is considered a contract and the engagement ring a symbol of this contract. In this case, the person who calls off the wedding is ‘at fault’ and the ring ownership goes to the other party. Just like the breaking of any other contract, if either or both parties are unable to fulfill the contract of getting married, the engagement ring goes to the original owner or purchaser of the ring.
Generally, the giver keeps the ring.
5. No-fault approaches (like No-Fault Divorces)
In these cases, the courts are not concerned with who is at fault in ending the engagement. Similar to the logic in a no-fault divorce, courts make it possible to settle without going into all the details of the break-up as they consider it to be simpler and more straightforward.
Generally, the giver keeps the ring.
6. The ring as a pledge
Sometimes the courts may characterize the ring as a symbol of the marriage, or a pledge “of the contract to marry.” In this case, if the engagement is no longer going forward the ring is returned to the giver. The difference between a conditional and pledged ring is that, as the name denotes, the gift is conditioned upon marriage, whereas a pledged ring is a gift that symbolizes the marriage.
Generally, the giver keeps the ring.
7. The ring as consideration
The courts may also rule that the ring was given in “consideration” – exchanged for the promise of marriage. Invoking language used in contract law, when the marriage does not occur, the contract has been breached and the engagement ring is returned to the giver.
Generally, the giver keeps the ring.
8. Statutory Issues
Some states have passed statutes that address the revocability of engagement rings. In these cases, the giver is able to get the ring back if the receiver would be unjustly ‘enriched’ by the gift (details in the next point).
Generally, the ring is returned to the giver.
9. Unjust Enrichment
In these cases, the courts find that if one of the parties involved are “unjustly enriched,” or if they have received a benefit of some kind, then the ring returns to the giver. However, they can only recover what was transferred as a gift with no extra punishment or reward. Courts use this theory of recovery as there is no need to “examine the minds of the parties and determine their sincerity,” making it possibly the most honest of the theories of recovery.
Generally, the ring is returned to the giver.
10. Civil Fraud
One of the harsher approaches the courts have taken to impose the return of the engagement ring to the giver is fraud. The giver in this case needs to prove that the recipient of the ring lied in order to receive it. In these cases, the penalty for the receiver may exceed the value of the gift.
Generally, the ring is returned to the giver.
Other factors that might influence a court’s decision include;
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten